Boris Berezovsky: Address to the 'Peripheral' Nation
Saturday, February 27, 2010 at 4:06PM 
The illustration is from St. Petersburg Dissenter March that took place in 2007. I thought the orange fog and the punk were somehow fitting. The sign reads: 'Berezovsky, we are with you!'
Borya the 'democract' is getting angry that his investment backfired :-), take a look...
I am addressing you, 'peripheral nation', to all of you without exception who supported Yanukovych.
You elected a gangster as your hetman (1) and a younger brother of his older brother. (2)
I am convinced not for long.
However I can't understand how many mega-liters of sycophantic (3) blood must flow through the veins of each one of you (You don't read Chekhov!), that you...in the internet age, the age of a Large Hadron Collider, the age of genetic engineering could fall for such ugliness?
'...' (4) Settle firm in the stinkiest 'yawning heights' (5) of the bygone days. Your gene pool survived worse genocides. But in your ignorant flight don't forget that as long as your hetman is a gangster you will live on the margins and not in Ukraine. (6)
PS: (7) I want to personally address the leader of the democratic world, US President Barack Obama and the ideologue of the contemporary Russian ignorance Vladimir Zhirinovsky, even though they didn't have direct influence in the election, but were the first to congratulate Yanukovych for his victory.
Gentlemen, I don't see a shred of coincidence in your sympathetic decision to acknowledge gangster as a leader of great European country.
In the Fall of 2004, according to reports of Fox News and CNN, US political elite found out with surprise about the existence, in the center of Europe, of an independent, nearly 50 000 000 country, but I still get the felling that democratic Iraq and Afghanistan are somehow more important than democratic Ukraine.
You Mr. Zhirinovsky, never acknowledged Ukraine as independent.
I want you Mr. Obama and you Mr. Zhirinovsky to remember a quote from the French writer de La Rochefoucauld: 'A politician's ability to look forward is dependant on how much he can look back.' And then there will be no illusions about a 'restart' (8) nor will there be any illusion that the future is behind the Ukrainian and not the marginal nation.
It is not advisable that you gentlemen, such wise politicians, ignore history.
-Boris Berezovsky, 17 February 2010, London for Ukrainska Pravda
Original is here.
1) пахана - гетманом -a poetic wordplay I was not able to express in English. Speaking of comparisons of saviours with gangsters, I remember seeing it at one other place where... :-))
2) The older brother probably lives in Moscow
3) рабской - literally meaning 'slave blood'
4) Перо в вам в ж... -Feather in your WTF? If somebody knows how to translate this so it captures the meaning please tell me.
5) A reference to Alexander Zinoviev's book of the same name in which the author criticises the Soviet system. I recall seeing Novodvorskaya on Ekho Moskvy saying that 'the Ukrainians elected Soviet trash.' Somehow this whole argument also reminds me of Yul'ka's elitist article.
6) на окраине, а не в Украине - a poetic play on words, it basically means that 'You, Ukrainians will be marginalized because you made a decision without considering what our opinions are.' It was kind of hard to cut through Borya's prose but that's what it essentially means.
7) Post scriptum is a longer string of bollocks than the scriptum itself.
8) перезагрузки - restart in American-Russian relation that came out as overload. I wonder which of the countries is more overloaded with debt and foreign policy engagements, including military.
Hat tip goes to Alxandre Lasta
Update: Kyiv Post also has an English translation

Reader Comments (8)
I heard about this open letter thingy. Talk about sore losers!
Incidentally, Oleg Kozlovsky used this exact image in a talk he delivered in Washington last month. He claimed that people with signs like these are Kremlin plants -- that they pop out from behind police lines for a quick photo and then jump back.
I can't verify whether Kozlovsky is right or wrong. The more important point, I think, is whether or not the members of Oborona and co. would claim to support Berezovsky or not. Even if they have personal misgivings about the man, their 'platform' (fluffy though it may be) would seem to count him among the unjustly slighted oligarchs of the 90s. That, not photos like these, are the real reason the Russian liberals have such low popularity, if you ask me.
At any rate, I just thought I'd throw that out there, seeing this post's image. :)
I would trust what Kozlovsky's version of events says, if I saw the full footage of the showdown this young man had with the member of OMON on the left. Kozlovsky's comment reminded me of a classic essay by Anatol Lieven...
'They think that they form some kind of opposition to the present Russian establishment. In fact, they are such an asset to Putin in terms of boosting public hostility to Russian liberalism that if they hadn’t already existed, Putin might have been tempted to invent them.'
http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=21586
Let him waffle on like this into irrelevance. The more silly his statements are the less influence he will carry. As the old saying goes, 'give them enough rope to hang themselves'. A good translation, you got all the nuances I see.
Interesting translation Leos; the guy made a fortune very crookedly and vastly over-estimates his intelligence. I also can't help noting how little tact a lot of neo-liberals have...
I'm amazed they put these people especially Berezovsky at the forefront of the "democratic" opposition rather than staying quietly in the background.
These are the same Oligarchs who did not care much about democracy when they ran the country into the ground during Yeltsin’s second term.
@ jack
I think Berezovsky wants to be seen, I mean he would not write such a 'literary jewel' as this letter if he didn't have something exhibitionist in him.
@Leoš Tomíček
I guess there is no consequence as the media here in Britain (Channel 4 being especially bad) is portrayed as “Kremlin critic” or “exiled businessman” no mention to the fact that he has connections to organised crime and Chechen terrorism/mafia.
Interesting that he was connected to 9/11 and the “Russian” mafia through a private security firm as Wayne Madsen reports just like it was revealed that during the Litvenenko plutonium fiasco that he operated and visited a private security firm.
“Scaramella-Berezovsky link to World Trade Center security firm emerges in Italian law enforcement investigation.”
http://www.rense.com/general74/russ.htm
Or how the FSB according to the official narrative were able to plant a fake plutonium trail in Berezovsky’s office and the security firm and subsequently erase all the different CCTV camera footage.
@ jack
I also find something very fishy about the Litvinenko case. How do you smuggle a highly toxic material into Britain, which leaves trails, and put a microscopic dose into food (or drink) of someone in Central London restaurant? I wonder if the staff in the kitchen wore anti-radiation suits. Also interesting is how instruments for measuring such a microscopic dose made their way into the kitchen without anyone noticing anything suspicious.
Litvinenko was not a high-profile target for the Russian Secret Service to enact something that amounts to a terrorist attack in the middle of the British capital. I mean, if they could pull off this type of operation, why didn't they go straight for Berezovsky?