Super-Slut
Thursday, July 22, 2010 at 10:43PM This is raw!
This bird has slept with 1000 men in 10 years, that was the target she set herself after watching the 'Sex and The City' series. I haven't seen a single episode of 'Sex and the City' and consider that a bliss. Let's see what this whore (Christina Saunders) thinks about the character (Sam) she modelled her life on:
'Sam went from one man to the next and was proud of it. I wanted to be confident like her. I got hooked on the buzz of one-night-stands.'
'Samantha was sexy, confident and proud. She had a male attitude of sleeping around and it fascinated me.'
Copulating like horny rabbits is considered a source of pride and confidence. Now something about Christina herself:
Attractive Christina grew up in a five-bedroom house in Hertfordshire where she enjoyed riding her pony...
Let stop here! Riding her pony? I think the editors of News of the World had a lot of fun compiling this. Here are the beginnings of Christina's exploits.
Soon Christina was on the prowl in Sam-style slinky dresses. Her first conquest was in the Students' Union...
By the time she left uni with a 2:2 degree in English and sociology in 2003 she'd slept with nearly 300 men...
She screwed all the Commies in SU, since this was probably done through encounters on parties, she was lucky to pass with 2:2. How did it make her feel?
'I didn't feel dirty, just empowered'
Female empowerment has many definition in contemporary world. The following exert however is funny...
She met Russian Sasha, in his 50s, in Puerto Banus, Spain, in 2005 and had sex on his boat. She said: 'It was mad and frantic. He shouted instructions - in Russian.'
:-)
Now the girl wants forgiveness:
Now the challenge is over Christina does have regrets. 'Good friends stuck by me but others accused me of being a slut. I took things too far. Now all I want to do is settle down. I just hope I haven't put men off.'
I think her friends were not making accusations, rather they were stating the obvious. Men will most definitely be put off after her vagina had been invaded by an army of 1000 men.
The article links to a story of this super-slut, with a score of 900. She says she did it because of peer pressure put on her for not having a boyfriend. What an excuse. Notice how both of these skanks display photos of themselves and provide the tabloids with a wealth of personal information.
Reader Comments (7)
What's wrong with sluts? They are a useful and effective caste that keeps society functional and lubricated (so to speak). Without them, most non-alpha males would go sexless for years at a time, leading to frustration, violence, wars, etc.
PS. Now that you seem into socio-sexual commentary and "game" theory, you might want to check out Roissy's blog Citizen Renegade. :)
I never believed in beta–males until I discovered "game" blogs. Then I realized what they do with their time.
Sluts are the vectors of STDs. If there is anything I find wrong about them is when they start pleading for forgiveness and advertise this in the media.
Sluts are also no guarantee that a large class of males will not go sexless for years. In fact there already is a large class of deprived males. Take for instance the grade the Super-Slut was awarded. You think most of the nerds that were aiming for 2:1 or even 1st were getting laid on regular basis? Some were, some were having fun occasionally, but I bet most weren't. Equally getting laid by a slut is no moderating factor on destructive behaviour because it is a form of destructive behaviour in itself.
In fact I do not believe there is any such thing as 'game.' I used the word for my post about the Palestinian Romeo with no qualification. Game as a concept has so many contradictory aspects coming from its practitioners that I am sceptical such a thing exists. Some of it is pretty helpful, but most of it is nothing but repackaged Pick-up Artistry. The typical, any man can use game as opposed to few men will ever learn game should serve as an example. Game also seems as something a man is endowed with, rather than something he learns. The good points about are more likely suggestions on what you shouldn't do, but any smart man who has been through multiple relationships and affairs can learn that by himself. Some of these guys will tell you how to dress or something similar, that's when I stop reading.
Also the thinking that alpha-malehood automatically leads to abundance of sex is in my opinion wrong. Alpha male does not exist because you can barely define him and you are certainly less able to put the label, 'abundance of sex' on him. What constitutes an alfa male?
Physical and Mental Health?
Wealth?
Power?
Fame?
Some alphas are having a good time. Some are not. The same way many omegas and betas are having it better than many Alphas.
http://men-factor.blogspot.com/2010/06/nonsense-and-idiotic-philosophy-in.html
This way of classifying men was invented by women, who will under certain conditions spread their legs regardless of what caste you belong to anyway. This classification might also be considered from the standpoint of how many women a man sleeps with. The more it is, the more he is alpha. No status indicators are necessary. But that would be a strictly male definition of alpha I guess.
I do not read roissy that much, only when somebody links to him. Currently I read these sites most often...
http://www.the-spearhead.com/
http://www.avoiceformen.com/
Some points:
1) Why is it bad when a woman sleeps with 1000 men but when a man sleeps with 1000 woman, it is considered good?
2) Aren't men who "sleep around" and don't practice safe sex also responsible for the spread of STD?
3) Isn't the use of the term "alpha-male" useless in a human context, since there are so many non-natural factors (social status, money etc.) which play a part in human sexual "attraction? (and we are not even beginning to talk about prostitution here!)"
4) Why do you denigrate this woman's potential as a long term life partner? At least she is very sexually experienced, and having exhausted her lust for male conquests, I am sure she would make for both a loving and loyal partner.
5) I'd rather say it is society which is at fault, a society which despite it's avowed post-modern liberalness is still mired in the sexual norms and values of the past.
Some more thoughts on the "alpha-male:"
Basically; who cares if you are capable of "conquering" a lot of women?
You might otherwise a complete nobody, and not being able to achieve much of note in life at all.
Unlike for example successful businessmen, academics, statesmen, sportsmen, etc. whose real contributions to human civilisation will stay immortalised for all posterity.
As far as I know there are hardly any pick-up artists who have acheved similar fame and remembrance.
In other words, who is the "real" "alpha male" - the guy who sleeps with a thousand women, or the guy who invented the computer, freed a nation, or put a man on the moon?
@ Richard
Points 1 and 2) Yes, men who do the same are wrong as well. And yes they are vectors of STDs too. I have yet to read an article like that above about a guy who screwed 1000 women. And when I say article like that above, I mean article without any criticisms of such behaviour. If you have any suggestions, I will post about it right away. So we can have that desired gender balance here on this site.
Point 3) As I see in your second comment, you ask a lot of questions about alpha malehood. It is because that concept is questionable, but women writers still use it to measure men. Recently I read that Obama is not alpha because he is not assertive enough.
Point 4) Once you go savage, there is a long journey back. I am not denigrating her potential to be a loyal partner for the rest of her life. She can be a partner to God in a monastery.
Point 5) I would rather subscribe to norms that have thousands of years of observation behind them instead of values drawn up by a bunch of crazy Communists in the 20th century.
Watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2w9UfnxM2k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpUYii5KOV4